hoden lutschen sorted by

relevance

Not much more I can do at this point.

We know you disagree there were BLP violations.

I placed more emphasis on the partial word "Pedia" as in encyclopedia 00:27, 6 September 2008 UTC The project is indeed open so that "anyone can edit", but each article and talkpage and all other Wikipedia pages has the ability to be protected; it is therefore apparent that semi-protection and protection are recognised as tools available for the benefit of the project.

14:19, 23 September 2008 UTC Same as my response to NYB's similar wording.

In cases where the appropriateness of material regarding a living person is questioned, the rule of thumb should be "do no harm.

Yes, like we said, we're getting to it.

What I didn't like, was the protection-warring from full to semi to full to semi, as this for those users suggests they have a strong POV in the article.

09:10, 6 September 2008 UTC• And by the time you've made the decision, ten more edits have occurred, and who knows if one of those is bad or not.

The evidence you present there shows that the system was working, not that it failed: I see edits adding material sourced to reliable sources such as The Washington Post, other material that was not and that was promptly deleted, and other material that was maybe borderline, but nothing out of the extraordinary that could not have been dealt with warnings, 3RR blocks or similar measures.

16:15, 7 September 2008 UTC Proposed remedies AGK [ ] Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.